The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JACK L. ARBISER
__________
Appeal 2007-0091
Application 09/765,491
Technology Center 1600
__________
HEARD February 6, 2007
__________
Before SCHEINER, GRIMES, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a method
of treating skin disorders using angiogenesis inhibitors. The Examiner has
rejected the claims as indefinite, anticipated, and obvious. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse the rejection for
indefiniteness, affirm the rejection for anticipation, affirm-in-part the
rejections for obviousness, and enter two new grounds of rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013