Ex Parte 5573648 et al - Page 3



            Appeal 2007-0128                                                                                  
            Reexamination Control 90/006,208                                                                  
            Patent 5,573,648                                                                                  

            electrode, a counter electrode and a protonic conductive electrolyte membrane                     
            situated between, and in contact with, the sensing and counter electrodes.  The                   
            sensing and counter electrodes each have a diameter in the range of approximately                 
            1 mm to 15 mm and the membrane has a thickness in the range of approximately                      
            0.1 mm to 1 mm.  The sensing and counter electrodes are mixed ionic-electronic                    
            conductive electrodes containing both an electronic conducting material and an                    
            ionic conducting material.                                                                        
                   The Examiner has rejected Atwood's claims setting forth four (4) prior art                 
            rejections.  Generally, the Examiner takes the position that the prior art teaches gas            
            sensors using a sensor electrode and a counter electrode with an                                  
            electrolyte membrane between the two electrodes, i.e., a membrane and electrode                   
            cell.  The Examiner acknowledges that no single reference relied upon by the                      
            Examiner teaches the use of the gas sensor with Atwood's claimed mixed                            
            conductive electrodes formed from an electronic conducting material and an ionic                  
            conducting material.  The Examiner states however, that the prior art describes the               
            mixed electrodes as suitable for use in gas sensors and identifies the benefits of                
            such electrodes, e.g., such electrodes have a uniform electrode structure which uses              
            a relatively small loading of catalyst.  (Grot U.S. Pat. 5,330,860, col. 3, ll. 49-57).           
                   Atwood disagrees with the Examiner's rejections.  Atwood generally argues                  
            that the Examiner has relied upon non-analogous art and that there is no motivation               
            to combine the prior art in the manner suggested by the Examiner.                                 


                                                      3                                                       



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013