Appeal 2007-0128 Reexamination Control 90/006,208 Patent 5,573,648 Tomantschger=s solid ionically conductive uranyl hydrogenphosphate tetrahydrate electrolyte in a gas sensor, such as Demspey=s, because the electrolyte forms an effective membrane for gas sensors employing a membrane and electrode structure. We affirm the Examiner=s rejection of claim 7 as obvious over Dempsey in view of Grot, Uchida and Vanderborgh and further in view of Tomantschger. D. Claims 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dempsey in view of Grot, Uchida or Vanderborgh and further in view of LaConti. Atwood claims 10 and 11 each depend from claim 1. Atwood claim 10 requires that the sensor be adapted to detect hydrogen and claim 11 requires the sensor be adapted to detect hydrogen sulfide. The Examiner states that Dempsey, Grot, Uchida, and Vanderborgh do not explicitly identify hydrogen or hydrogen sulfide as the gases being detected. (Examiner’s Answer, p. 7). The Examiner cites LaConti as teaching that it was known in the art to adapt gas sensors to detect hydrogen and hydrogen sulfide. (Id.). Atwood states that there is no proper combination of references that teaches or suggests each and every element of claims 10 and 11. Atwood argues that LaConti teaches away from the subject matter of the claims as it requires that the sensing and counter electrodes to be located on the same side of the membrane. 55Page: Previous 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013