The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte PETER T. GEORGE ___________ Appeal No. 2007-0133 Application No. 10/223,466 Technology Center 3700 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Decided: July 31, 2007 ___________ Before ROBERT E. NAPPI, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This is a decision on Appellant’s Request for Reconsideration filed March 21, 2007. We treat the Request for Reconsideration as a request for rehearing under 37 C.F.R. § 41.52 (2006). The appeal was initially decided by a 3-judge panel consisting of Judges Nappi, Horner, and Fetting. The panel sustained a rejection of claims 1, 5 through 15, 35, and 37 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The request seeks rehearing of the original panel’s decision sustaining thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013