Appeal Number: 2007-0133 Application Number: 10/223,466 not meet the requirements of our prior precedents.” Benson, 409 U.S. at 71. Rather than rule on this question in Benson and Flook, the Supreme Court decided those cases based on the abstract idea exception to patentability. Benson, 409 U.S. at 71-72; Flook, 437 U.S. at 594-95. Since Diehr, the Federal Circuit has reviewed several computer technology cases, and in acknowledgment of the innovations occurring in this technological field, identified a third category of method claims that qualify as a “process.” Extrapolating from the Supreme Court’s “transformation and reduction of an article” test, the Federal Circuit has held that transformation of intangible subject matter (i.e., data or signals) may also qualify as a § 101 process. See, e.g., State Street, 149 F.3d at 1373. Responding to the argument that process claims must recite a “physical transformation,” the Federal Circuit in AT&T ruled that “physical transformation” “is not an invariable requirement, but merely one example of how a mathematical algorithm may bring about a useful application.” AT&T, 172 F.3d at 1358. Quoting the Supreme Court’s language, “e.g., transforming or reducing an article to a different state or thing” from Diehr, the AT&T court noted the usage of “e.g.” “denotes an example, not an exclusive requirement.” Id. at 1359. AT&T went on to cite the transformation of intangible data signals in the method claim of Arrhythmia Research Technology Inc. v. Corazonix Corp., 958 F.2d 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1992), as an example that qualifies as a § 101 ‘process” in addition to the Supreme Court’s test. See id. at 1359. Accordingly, the Federal Circuit has consistently used its own “data transformation” test in assessing the eligibility of various machine-implemented claims. In Alappat, the Court held that “data, transformed by a machine” “to produce a smooth waveform display” “constituted a practical application of an 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013