Ex Parte Belder et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                        
                                            precedent of the Board.                                                   

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                    __________                                                        
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                    __________                                                        
                            Ex parte RENE BELDER and MARK E. MCGOVERN                                                 
                                                    __________                                                        
                                                Appeal 2007-0185                                                      
                                             Application 10/305,281                                                   
                                             Technology Center 1600                                                   
                                                    __________                                                        
                                             Decided:  June 28, 2007                                                  
                                                    __________                                                        
             Before DONALD E. ADAMS, DEMETRA J. MILLS, RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ,                                           
             Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                            
             MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                    The Appellants appeal the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-9 for                            
             obviousness.                                                                                             
                    We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).                                               
                    WE AFFIRM.                                                                                        


                    Claim 1 is directed to:                                                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013