The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte STEPHAN EHLERS, KOLN, JOSE F. PAZOS,
CHRISTIAN STEINLEIN, MICHAEL SCHNEIDER, JORG HOFMANN,
MAJID KEYVANI, and JOHN E. HAYES
__________
Appeal 2007-0310
Application 10/260,498
Technology Center 1600
__________
Decided: April 30, 2007
__________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and ERIC GRIMES,
Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a process
for preparing an ethylene oxide-capped polyol. The Examiner has rejected
the claims as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We
affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013