Appeal No. 2007-0384 Application No. 09/681,784 3. SABA SOFTWARE WITH COLLEGEBYTES Claims 10, 17, and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Saba’s software in view of CollegeBytes.com, as disclosed in CommonPlaces.2 The Examiner states that “Saba Software’s learning management system does not expressly teach . . . [a]cquiring or selling learning solutions in an online auction format” (Answer 10). However, the Examiner argues that “Collegebytes.com (1999) teaches a computer-based system that sells textbooks via an online auction format” (id.). The Examiner concludes that it would have been “obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to combine the teachings of Saba Software and collegebytes.com to create a system and method to sell learning solutions via an online auction format for the advantages of an efficient marketplace” (id.). In addition, the Examiner argues that “the ability to auction off learning solutions does not affect the competency assessment aspects of the claims; therefore, such an auctioning service is effectively a value added service that enhances the experience of a user by allowing him/her to quickly and conveniently plan as much of his/her learning experience as possibl[e] in a single interface or environment” (id. at 14). As indicated in CommonPlaces, CollegeBytes.com is an Internet Hub for college audiences. CollegeBytes.com includes online auction capabilities that allow users to “buy and sell everything from dorm furniture to textbooks to musical instruments to computers.” We conclude that one of 2 “CommonPlaces, in Agreement with Reuters Health Information, to Offer Free Access to Health News Via CollegeBytes.com,” Business Wire (1999). 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013