Appeal No. 2007-0384
Application No. 09/681,784
We conclude that the Examiner has set forth a prima facie case that
claim 12 would have been obvious over Saba’s software in view of Tuttle,
which Appellant has not rebutted. We therefore affirm the rejection of
claim 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Claims 11 and 14 fall with claim 12.
SUMMARY
The Examiner’s position is supported by the preponderance of the
evidence of record. We therefore affirm the rejection of claims 1-20 under
35 U.S.C. § 103.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
ERIC GRIMES )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LORA M. GREEN )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
NANCY J. LINCK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EB/MLM
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013