Ex Parte Suzuki et al - Page 12


                Appeal No. 2007-0464                                                                                                   
                Application 09/964,874                                                                                                 
                offset value and/or the tracking offset value.  Appeal Brief at Page 7, Lines 4-12.  Although a                        
                few lines later on the same page in the appeal brief the applicant added the words “in the manner                      
                described in the claim,” a full reading of the argument reflects the applicant’s clear position that                   
                it is because the examiner did not show that Otsuka discloses “any” setting and resetting                              
                whatsoever that Otsuka cannot possibly disclose setting and resetting in the manner described in                       
                the claim.  On Page 8 of the appeal brief the applicant restates that the examiner has not shown                       
                that Otsuka discloses setting and resetting under the conditions specified in the claim.                               
                        It suffices to say only that the applicant’s argument is general and never identifies what                     
                manner or condition for setting and resetting is not met by Otsuka.  Indeed, as noted above there                      
                is a clear explanation in the appeal brief that setting and resetting an offset in the manner                          
                required by the claim are not met by Otsuka only because the examiner has not shown that                               
                Otsuka discloses any setting and resetting of an offset value.  We decline to look on our own for                      
                manners and conditions in the claim, unspecified by the applicant, which may not be met by                             
                Otsuka.  If there is a missing feature, the argument has been waived.                                                  
                        The examiner cited to Paragraphs 23-27 of Otsuka-English as supporting the                                     
                determination that the features of setting a tracking offset value at startup and subsequent                           
                resetting of the tracking offset value are met.  We have quoted Paragraphs 23-25 of Otsuka-                            
                English in Fact Findings 18 and 19, and find that those portions of Otsuka-English reasonably                          
                convey the setting of a tracking offset at startup and subsequent resetting of the tracking offset at                  
                a later time.  The word “Next” at the beginning of Paragraph 24 reasonably indicates that the                          
                setting of the offset value as described in Paragraph 23 is in a category all by itself, separate                      
                from all the subsequent resetting as described in Paragraphs 24 and 25.  The examiner has set                          
                forth at least a prima facie case that Otsuka discloses an initial setting of the tracking offset value                


                                                                  12                                                                   

Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013