The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL C. PITMAN, BLAKE G. FITCH,
HANS W. HORN, WOLFGANG HUBER,
JULIA E. RICE, and WILLIAM C. SWOPE
____________
Appeal 2007-0537
Application 10/102,902
Technology Center 1600
____________
Decided: July 23, 2007
____________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ERIC GRIMES, and NANCY J. LINCK,
Administrative Patent Judges.
LINCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a 35 U.S.C. § 134 appeal in the above-referenced case.1
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
1 The application was filed March 22, 2002. The real party in interest is the
assignee, International Business Machines Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013