The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SUN KWAN EOM ____________ Appeal 2007-0602 Application 10/842,456 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Decided: June 6, 2007 ____________ Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 15-20, which are all of the claims pending in this application as claims 1-14 have been canceled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013