Ex Parte Eom - Page 4



               adjacent an LCD panel.  The channel is filled with an arc-discharging gas                  
               while an electric field generating means is disposed along opposing lateral                
               sides of the channel.  Emphasis added.                                                     
                     Tyler discloses a planar gas discharge lamp for backlit displays                     
               wherein a planar envelope filled with gas defines an elongated discharge                   
               path and includes a pair of electrodes for causing the discharge within the                
               envelope (col. 1, l. 66 through col. 2, l. 4).                                             
                     The discharge path is described as a serpentine path defined by a                    
               plurality of parallel walls while the electrodes extend in alignment with the              
               walls and along the same surface of the envelope (col. 2, ll. 9-13).                       
                     As shown in Figure 1 of Tyler, the envelope of lamp 1 is depicted as                 
               block 10 with walls 11-14 forming parallel channels 15-22 (col. 3, ll. 12-20).             
               Two electrodes 45 and 46 are arranged alongside the edge of the envelope in                
               an interleaving manner (col. 5, ll. 25-35) or alternatively, could be located              
               internally of the envelope (col. 6, ll. 22-23).                                            
                                         PRINCIPLES OF LAW                                                
                     1.   Scope of claims                                                                 
                     Absent an express intent to impart a novel meaning to a claim term,                  
               the words take on the ordinary and customary meanings attributed to them                   
               by those of ordinary skill in the art.  Brookhill-Wilk 1, LLC v. Intuitive                 
               Surgical, Inc., 334 F.3d 1294, 1298, 67 USPQ2d 1132, 1135-36 (Fed. Cir.                    
               2003). The claim construction analysis begins with the words of the claim.                 
               See Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic, Inc., 90 F.3d 1576, 1582, 39 USPQ2d,                  
               1573, 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1996).  Claims will be given their broadest reasonable               
               interpretation consistent with the specification, and limitations appearing in             
               the specification are not to be read into the claims.  In re Etter, 756 F.2d               
               852, 858, 225 USPQ 1, 5 (Fed. Cir. 1985).                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013