The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROSE MARY FARENDEN
____________
Appeal 2007-0611
Application 09/800,986
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: June 21, 2007
____________
Before HUBERT C. LORIN, JENNIFER D. BAHR and LINDA E. HORNER,
Administrative Patent Judges.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant seeks our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) of the Examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 6-8, and 11-13, all the claims currently pending in
the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013