Appeal 2007-0728
Application 09/954,796
1 12. The Examiner admits that Parthesarathy alone does not show an alternative
2 selection in response to receipt of a user selection that identifies a software
3 program the user already possesses (Answer 18).
4 13. The Examiner has provided no support for a rejection of claim 19 over
5 Parthesarathy alone.
6 14. Thus, we cannot say that Parthesarathy alone shows an alternative selection
7 in response to receipt of a user selection that identifies a software program
8 the user already possesses.
9 15. Parthesarathy shows a software application querying a user whether the user
10 wants to load a new software update now, later, or never (Parthesarathy, col.
11 6, ll. 15-20).
12 16. To accomplish is to complete5.12
13 17. To load a new software update is to complete the updating of the software,
14 or to accomplish the updating.
15 18. Thus, Parthesarathy shows querying a user as to what the user wants to
16 accomplish.
17 19. Parthesarathy shows that if the user wants to accomplish a software update,
18 the software update is loaded (Parthesarathy, col. 6, ll. 23-26).
19 20. Thus, Parthesarathy shows providing software programs based upon the user
20 responses.
5 See supra, note 3.
9
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013