Appeal 2007-0728
Application 09/954,796
1 • The art applied shows downloading from a storage medium read by the
2 computing device (FF 11).
3 • The art applied shows logic configured to query a user as to the needs of the
4 user and receive user responses to the query (FF 03).
5 • The art applied shows logic configured to characterize the use of the user
6 based upon the user responses (FF 06).
7 • The art applied shows logic configured to provide software programs that
8 may be beneficial to the user based upon the characterization of the use
9 (FF 08).
10 • With respect to claim 19, we cannot say that Parthesarathy alone shows an
11 alternative selection in response to receipt of a user selection that identifies a
12 software program the user already possesses (FF 14).
13 • The art applied shows querying a user as to what the user wants to
14 accomplish (FF 18).
15 • The art applied shows providing software programs based upon the user
16 responses (FF 20).
17 • The art applied shows suggesting software programs based upon the user
18 responses (FF 23).
19 • The art applied shows determining tasks a user wishes to accomplish from
20 responses provided by the user (FF 18).
21 • The art applied shows installing software programs based upon the
22 determination (FF 20).
12
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013