Appeal 2007-0728
Application 09/954,796
1
2 • Claims 33-36 (Br. 15-16)
3 o Whether the art applied shows determining tasks a user wishes to
4 accomplish from responses provided by the user.
5 o Whether the art applied shows installing software programs based
6 upon the determination.
7 • Claims 2, 37, 39, and 41 (Br. 16-17)
8 o Whether there is motivation to combine the art applied.
9 • Claims 6, 13, and 19 (Br. 17)
10 o Whether the art applied shows suggesting an alterative in response to
11 receipt of a user selection that identifies a software program the user
12 already possesses.
13 • Claims 3, 21-24, and 44 (Br. 18-19)
14 o Whether the art applied shows querying the user as to how the user
15 plans to use a peripheral device (claim 3).
16 o Whether the art applied shows querying a user as to what the
17 peripheral device may be used for (claim 21).
18 • Claim 43 (Br. 19-20)
19 o Whether the art applied shows querying a user as to what the
20 peripheral device may be used for.
21
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013