1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte BRIAN J. BROWN, STEVEN L. WEBB, JERLYN R. CULP,
12 MIKE A. FARRELL, and KIMBERLY A. BITNER
13 ___________
14
15 Appeal 2007-0728
16 Application 09/954,796
17 Technology Center 2100
18 ___________
19
20 Decided: April 23, 2007
21 ___________
22
23 Before STUART S. LEVY, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,
24 Administrative Patent Judges.
25 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
26 DECISION ON APPEAL
27
28
29 STATEMENT OF CASE
30 This appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-44, the only claims
31 pending in this application, arises under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have jurisdiction
32 over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
33 We AFFIRM and ENTER A NEW GROUND OF REJECTION UNDER
34 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013