Appeal 2007-0728
Application 09/954,796
1 • Claims 17-20 and 42 (Br. 13-14)
2 o Whether the art applied shows logic configured to query a user as to
3 the needs of the user.
4 o Whether the art applied shows logic configured to characterize the use
5 of the user based upon the user responses.
6 o Whether the art applied shows logic configured to provide software
7 programs that may be beneficial to the user based upon the
8 characterization of the use.
9 o Whether the art applied shows logic configured to suggest an
10 alternative selection in response to receipt of a user selection that
11 identifies a software program the user already possesses.
12 • Claims 25-28 (Br. 14)
13 o Whether the art applied shows querying a user as to what the user
14 wants to accomplish.
15 o Whether the art applied shows providing software programs based
16 upon the user responses.
17 • Claims 29-32 (Br. 14-15)
18 o Whether the art applied shows querying a user as to the needs of the
19 user.
20 o Whether the art applied shows suggesting software programs based
21 upon the user responses.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013