Appeal 2007-0914 Application 09/904,734 Claim 12. A server computer system connected to at least one client computer, the server computer system comprising a memory containing a code-set program and at least one processor, wherein the processor, when executing the code-set program, is configured to: determine if a request header composed according to a network communications protocol received with a client request from the at least one client computer designates a character set; and if the request header does not designate the character set: (i) retrieve locale information from the client request; and (ii) associate the locale information with a character set. The following references are relied on by the Examiner: Watanabe US 6,185,729 B1 Feb. 6, 2001 Veditz US 6,496,793 B1 Dec. 17, 2002 (filed Apr. 21, 1993) Horn US 2002/0156688 A1 Oct. 24, 2002 (filed Feb. 21, 2001) Kan US 2003/0088544 A1 May 31, 2003 (filed May 31, 2001) Claims 1-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner relies upon Veditz and Watanabe for the first stated rejection of claims 1, 3-5, 7-9, 12-14, 16, 18-20 and 22-24. Veditz and Watanabe are combined with Horn in the second stated rejection of claims 2, 6, 10, 11, 171, 21, 26 and 27. Veditz and Watanabe are combined with Kan for the third stated rejection of claims 15 and 25.2 1 We note that claim 17 depended from claim 16 in the originally filed claims, but was changed to depend from claim 1 in the claims filed 11/22/2004. However, the change was not marked, and would have resulted 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013