Ex Parte Banerjee et al - Page 3

                Appeal 2007-0914                                                                                 
                Application 09/904,734                                                                           

                       Claim 12. A server computer system connected to at least one                              
                client computer, the server computer system comprising a memory                                  
                containing a code-set program and at least one processor, wherein the                            
                processor, when executing the code-set program, is configured to:                                
                       determine if a request header composed according to a network                             
                communications protocol received with a client request from the at least one                     
                client computer designates a character set; and                                                  
                       if the request header does not designate the character set:                               
                             (i) retrieve locale information from the client request; and                        
                             (ii) associate the locale information with a character set.                         

                       The following references are relied on by the Examiner:                                   
                Watanabe    US 6,185,729 B1  Feb. 6, 2001                                                        
                Veditz   US 6,496,793 B1  Dec. 17, 2002                                                          
                                                                     (filed Apr. 21, 1993)                       
                Horn    US 2002/0156688 A1 Oct. 24, 2002                                                         
                                                                     (filed Feb. 21, 2001)                       
                Kan    US 2003/0088544 A1 May 31, 2003                                                           
                                                                     (filed May 31, 2001)                        
                       Claims 1-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of                      
                obviousness, the Examiner relies upon Veditz and Watanabe for the first                          
                stated rejection of claims 1, 3-5, 7-9, 12-14, 16, 18-20 and 22-24.  Veditz                      
                and Watanabe are combined with Horn in the second stated rejection of                            
                claims 2, 6, 10, 11, 171, 21, 26 and 27.  Veditz and Watanabe are combined                       
                with Kan for the third stated rejection of claims 15 and 25.2                                    
                                                                                                                
                1 We note that claim 17 depended from claim 16 in the originally filed                           
                claims, but was changed to depend from claim 1 in the claims filed                               
                11/22/2004.  However, the change was not marked, and would have resulted                         
                                                       3                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013