Ex Parte Banerjee et al - Page 10

                Appeal 2007-0914                                                                                 
                Application 09/904,734                                                                           

                       For the foregoing reasons, I disagree with the majority’s finding that                    
                the subject matter of claim 12, which is also recited as alternative (a) in                      
                claims 1 and 16), is admitted prior art.                                                         





















                pgc                                                                                              
                IBM CORPORATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW                                                       
                DEPT 917, BLDG. 006-1                                                                            
                3605 HIGHWAY 52 NORTH                                                                            
                ROCHESTER MN 55901-7829                                                                          




                                                       10                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10

Last modified: September 9, 2013