The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WON BANG, CHEN-AN CHEN, SHANKAR VENKATARAMAN, and AJAY BHATNAGAR ____________ Appeal 2007-0949 Application 10/081,312 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: July 31, 2007 ____________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal the final rejection of claims 1-12, 14-15, and 18-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013