Ex Parte Armijo et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1096                                                                              
                Application 10/872,181                                                                        

                      uvula (the small fleshy tissue hanging from the center of the                           
                      back of the throat) relax and sag, the relaxed tissues may vibrate                      
                      as air flows past the tissues during breathing, resulting in                            
                      snoring.  Snoring affects about half of men and 25 percent of                           
                      women--most of whom are age 50 or older.”                                               
                (Nelson,1 col. 1, ll. 27-34.)                                                                 
                      Many different devices, methods, drugs, and surgical procedures have                    
                been utilized to treat snoring (Specification 1: 18-19).  Surgical procedures                 
                “are rather drastic, painful, and expensive and do have their own risks.”  (Id.               
                at 2: 15-16).  “The mouthpiece devices are also inconvenient and hard to                      
                wear and maintain during sleep.  Drugs and medications have also been                         
                ineffective.”  (Id. at 2: 18-20.)                                                             
                      “[T]he present invention offers an anti-snoring device that is affixed                  
                to the soft palate or uvula by piercing.”  (Id. at 2: 21-22.)  “This invention is             
                generally related to a prosthesis that inhibits fluttering of the soft palate                 
                during sleep, as air flows past it.”  (Id. at 3: 8-9.)                                        
                      Claims 1-4, 14, and 15 are pending and stand rejected over prior art                    
                (Br. 4).  The Examiner relies on the following references as evidence of                      
                unpatentability:                                                                              
                      Pflueger  US 2004/0134491  Jul. 15, 2004                                                
                                                              (filed Jul. 22, 2003).                          
                      Nelson  US 6,955,172 B2   Oct. 18, 2005                                                 
                                                               (filed Sept. 6, 2002).                         
                      Claims 1, 3, 14, and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                      
                anticipated by Nelson (Answer 3).  Claims 2 and 4 stand rejected under                        

                                                                                                             
                1 U.S. Pat. 6,955,172 B2, issued Oct. 18, 2005 (filed Sept. 6, 2002).                         

                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013