Ex Parte Newman et al - Page 9

                Appeal 2007-1363                                                                              
                Application 10/637,419                                                                        

                as disclosed in ¶¶ [0015] through [0022]).  If the “related art” value of 25%                 
                was indeed “prior art,” this value would anticipate the range of                              
                “approximately 0% to approximately 75%” as recited in claim 1 on appeal.                      
                      D. Time Period for Response                                                             
                      No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                      
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).                         
                                                AFFIRMED                                                      






                sld/ls                                                                                        
                FARAJAMI & FARAJAMI LLP                                                                       
                26522 LA ALAMEDA AVE.,                                                                        
                SUITE 360                                                                                     
                MISSION VIEJO, CA  92691                                                                      














                                                      9                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9

Last modified: September 9, 2013