The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MIHAELOS N. MIHALOS, ALLISON ANTONINI, CAROL WINES, GARY A. LEWIS, JENNIFER K. THOMAS, KRISTINE GERARD, JULIA LEIGH DESROCHERS, and ZENA E. FORTE ____________ Appeal 2007-1390 Application 10/842,392 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: May 16, 2007 ____________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-15, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013