Appeal 2007-1390
Application 10/842,392
Accordingly, we determine that the Examiner has established a proper
reasoned analysis for combining the references as proposed.
For the foregoing reasons and those stated in the Answer, we affirm
the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-15 under § 103(a) over Morano in view
of Thulin.
The decision of the Examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
tf/ls
Thaddius J. Carvis
102 North King Street
Leesburg, VA 20176
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013