The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRISTOPHER MCAULIFFE, CRAIG M. BEERS,
and THOMAS ZYWIAK
____________
Appeal 2007-1420
Application 10/992,431
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: August 21, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, KENNETH W. HAIRSTON,
and JOSEPH L. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
While this appeal involves claims 1 through 3, 10, and 17, the
Examiner has allowed claims 4 through 9, and 18 through 20. We have
jurisdiction for decision on this appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013