Appeal 2007-1624 Application 10/424,662 encoding system, a color encoding system, or a combination of any of these, or any other encoding system” (Fodor, at col. 21, ll. 54-60). 8. Claim 2 of Fodor is directed to a method of detecting nucleic acid sequences using an array of polynucleotides bound to a solid support, where “the solid support comprises an array of beads” (Fodor, at col. 82, ll. 49-50). 9. When a single substrate surface is utilized (Findings of Fact (“FF”) FF 1; Fodor, at col. 3, ll. 6-13), the positional attachment of oligonucleotides to the solid substrate surface is necessary to determine which sequences are present in the target DNA (e.g., Fodor, at col. 2, ll. 35-39; col. 3, ll. 19-29; and col. 19, ll. 20-32). Pirrung 10. Pirrung describes determining signal detection capability of fluorescent beads (col. 26, ll. 11-45). “One of the beads was placed in the illumination field on the scan stage . . . in a field of a laser” (Pirrung, at col. 26, ll. 18-21). 11. The laser beam was directed at the bead and the resulting fluorescence was measured (Pirrung, at col. 26, ll. 20-29). 12. The bead utilized in the assay described by Pirrung (col. 26) did not contain attached DNA and was not arranged with other particles to form an oligonucleotide array. 13. There is no teaching in Pirrung that the particles with attached DNA can be arranged on a substrate in a planar configuration. DISCUSSION Rejection under § 112, first paragraph Claims 77-86, 88, 89, and 105-108 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013