The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent
of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENICHI SATOU
____________
Appeal 2007-1714
Application 10/096,6841
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: September 20, 2007
____________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and
DAVID B. WALKER, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 The application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Japanese Application
P. 2001-74428 filed on March 15, 2001. The real party in interest is Fuji Jukogyo
Kabushiki Kaisha of Tokyo, Japan.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013