Ex Parte Satou - Page 2



              Appeal 2007-1714                                                                                               
              Application 10/096,684                                                                                         

                                            STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                            
                      Appellant seeks our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Examiner’s final                               
              rejection of claims 1-5, 9-13, 17-31, 33-35, and 37-55.  We have jurisdiction under                            
              35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse.                                                                                  
                                                   THE INVENTION                                                             
                      Appellant claims a vehicle body front end module for holding at least a                                
              radiator core and a condenser (Specification 1:4-7).  Claim 1, reproduced below, is                            
              representative of the subject matter on appeal.                                                                
                             1.  A vehicle body front structure comprising:                                                  
                                    a molded one-piece front end module disposed at a                                        
                             front end of a vehicle body, said molded one-piece front                                        
                             end module comprising:                                                                          
                                            a radiator core support; and                                                     
                                            a protruding portion; and                                                        
                                    a front bumper including a lower portion enclosing                                       
                             an upper impact absorbing member and a lower impact                                             
                             absorbing member,                                                                               
                                    wherein said lower impact absorbing member is                                            
                             supported by said protruding portion.                                                           
                                                  THE REJECTIONS                                                             
                      The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence in support of the                                   
              rejections:                                                                                                    
                       Renault                      US 6,435,577 B1                  Aug. 20, 2002                           
                       Nomura                       JP 11-152062 A                     Jun. 8, 1999                          


                                                             2                                                               



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013