1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent 2 of the Board. 3 4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 5 ___________ 6 7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 8 AND INTERFERENCES 9 ___________ 10 11 Ex parte BJORN MARKUS JAKOBSSON 12 ___________ 13 14 Appeal 2007-1751 15 Application 09/769,511 16 Technology Center 3600 17 ___________ 18 19 Decided: July 26, 2007 20 ___________ 21 22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING, 23 Administrative Patent Judges. 24 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge. 25 DECISION ON APPEAL 26 27 28 STATEMENT OF CASE 29 Bjorn Markus Jakobsson (Appellant) seeks review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of a 30 final rejection of claims 2-6 and 8-19, the only claims pending in the application on 31 appeal. 32 We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6. 33 34 We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013