Ex Parte Jakobsson - Page 2

            Appeal 2007-1751                                                                                 
            Application 09/769,511                                                                           

        1       The Appellant invented improved techniques for controlling access of                         
        2   telemarketers or other types of call originators to user terminals of a                          
        3   communication system (Specification 2).  An understanding of the invention can                   
        4   be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 16, which is reproduced below                       
        5   [bracketed matter added].                                                                        
        6          16. A method for controlling access of call originators to user                           
        7          terminals in a communication system, the method comprising the                            
        8          steps of:                                                                                 
        9          [1] storing for a given user terminal of the system a set of user-                        
       10          specified access cost information to be applied to one or more                            
       11          incoming calls directed to the user terminal; and                                         
       12          [2] determining an amount to charge an originator of a given                              
       13          incoming call directed to the user terminal [3] based at least in part on                 
       14          an access cost for the given incoming call as determined from the                         
       15          user-specified access cost information;                                                   
       16          [4] wherein the user-specified access cost information is at least in                     
       17          part entered by the user at a web site associated with a service                          
       18          provider that implements the storing and determining steps. (emphasis                     
       19          not in original.)                                                                         
       20                                                                                                    
       21       This appeal arises from the Examiner’s Final Rejection, mailed January 31,                   
       22   2006.  The Appellant filed an Appeal Brief in support of the appeal on October 9,                
       23   2006, and the Examiner mailed an Examiner’s Answer to the Appeal Brief on                        
       24   December 8, 2006.  A Reply Brief was filed on December 27, 2006.                                 
       25                                                                                                    






                                                      2                                                      


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013