Ex Parte Davison et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                    not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                   Ex parte KERRY LEEDS DAVISON, DONALD EARL HAWK JR.                                       
                                         and YEHUDA SMOOHA                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-1862                                                
                                          Application 10/722,652                                            
                                         Technology Center 2800                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 31, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOHN C. MARTIN,                                                      
               and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
               THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This appeal involves claims 1 through 8, 14, 15, and 17 through 20 as                 
               reflected at pages 2 and 3 of the Answer where the Examiner has indicated                    
               the allowability of claims 9 through 13, and 16.  We have jurisdiction under                 
               35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).                                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013