The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KERRY LEEDS DAVISON, DONALD EARL HAWK JR. and YEHUDA SMOOHA ____________ Appeal 2007-1862 Application 10/722,652 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Decided: August 31, 2007 ____________ Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOHN C. MARTIN, and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 1 through 8, 14, 15, and 17 through 20 as reflected at pages 2 and 3 of the Answer where the Examiner has indicated the allowability of claims 9 through 13, and 16. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013