The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANKLIN M. BAEZ
____________
Appeal 2007-2016
Application 09/148,392
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 10, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, MAHSHID D. SAADAT,
and SCOTT R. BOALICK, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from a Final Rejection of
claims 1-20 and 22-29, which are all of the claims pending in this
application, as claim 21 has been canceled. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013