Ex Parte Fang et al - Page 1

                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                         
                                     not binding precedent of the Board                                       
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                          Ex parte SHENQING FANG, TIMOTHY THURGATE,                                           
                               KUO-TUNG CHANG, RICHARD FASTOW,                                                
                               ANGELA T. HUI, KAZUHIRO MIZUTANI,                                              
                                 KELWIN KO, HIROYUKI KINOSHITA                                                
                                    YU SUN and HIROYUKI OGAWA                                                 
                                             Appeal 2007-2105                                                 
                                           Application 10/762,445                                             
                                          Technology Center 2800                                              
                                         Decided: August 17, 2007                                             
                Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, MAHSHID D. SAADAT,                                                 
                and ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
                SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the Examiner’s                          
                Final Rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-9, and 11-14, which are all of the claims                   

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013