1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte CHRISTOPHER S. AUTTERSON
12 ____________________
13
14 Appeal 2007-2111
15 Application 09/921,2041
16 Technology Center 3700
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: August 3, 2007
20 ____________________
21
22 Before: STUART S. LEVY, LINDA E. HORNER, and JOSEPH
23 FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25 LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29
30 STATEMENT OF CASE
31 Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection
32 of claims 1 and 11. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
1 Application filed August 2, 2001. The real party in interest is Argent
Automotive Systems, Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013