Ex Parte Novais et al - Page 15


              Appeal 2007-2215                                                                                     
              Application 09/918,287                                                                               
         1    410.  According to Shniberg’s Paragraph 74, someone who already has access to                        
         2    ticket 410 need not be involved in any communication and may simply enter at the                     
         3    web site the seat location indicia 412 on ticket 410.  That alone refutes the                        
         4    Applicants’ argument that in Paragraph 74 of Shniberg, “real time” means that the                    
         5    images are viewed during the communication session in which the spectator                            
         6    identification code is provided from the spectator to the person with access to the                  
         7    web site.  The indefinite reference to “any picture taken of a spectator” is also not                
         8    inconsistent with directing movement of the camera to the proper seat location in                    
         9    response to the seat location indicia provided, because the spectator is not                         
        10    necessarily always located at his or her assigned seat if and when the image                         
        11    capturing device has been directed to the spectator’s assigned seat.                                 
        12          The Applicants point out that a reference must be read for all that it teaches.                
        13    That is true.  The embodiment described in Shniberg’s Paragraphs 74 and 75                           
        14    cannot be ignored on the ground that other embodiments disclosed in Shniberg do                      
        15    not involve real time viewing of images taken of a spectator.  The Applicants argue                  
        16    (Reply Br. 9) that because there are unlikely to be sufficient cameras in football                   
        17    stadiums to view every single person simultaneously, the Shniberg system cannot                      
        18    possibly accommodate web-user driven imaging in real time of every single                            
        19    spectator.  The argument is misplaced, as Shniberg is a publication and not an                       
        20    actual system in usage, and because Applicants’ claims do not require an ability to                  
        21    direct the image capture device to every single seating location, without exception.                 
        22    Even if Shniberg’s system cannot implement real time imaging of every single                         
        23    spectator at an event, there is still no merit to the Applicants’ argument.                          
        24          The Applicants also argue that the reference in Shniberg to real time                          
        25    viewing of any picture “taken” is expressed in the past tense and therefore not                      
        26    really in real time with respect to the taking of the picture.  The argument is                      


                                                        15                                                         

Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013