Ex Parte Novais et al - Page 18


              Appeal 2007-2215                                                                                     
              Application 09/918,287                                                                               
         1                          The Obviousness Rejection of Claim 16                                          
         2                              over Blank, Gluck, and Showghi                                             
         3                                                                                                         
         4          Claim 16 requires the step of offering an interactive selection session to the                 
         5    customer to permit the customer, while seated at the seating location, to select a                   
         6    desired image or images from displayed images and select a desired image product                     
         7    representative of the desired image or images.  Per another step in claim 16, the                    
         8    displayed images have to be on an interactive display screen accessible at the                       
         9    seating location of the customer.  None of Blank or Gluck, as applied by the                         
        10    Examiner, discloses these features.  In Gluck, a customer does not have an option                    
        11    to make image selection while located at his or her assigned seat.  Instead, an                      
        12    interactive selection is made available at video units located throughout the venue                  
        13    (Gluck, col. 6, ll. 62-65) or a walk-up window at an assembly site preferably at the                 
        14    event venue (Gluck, col. 7, ll. 2-5).  Blank does not even disclose an entertainment                 
        15    event with spectators viewing the event at a venue.  The Examiner determined that                    
        16    in Gluck there are locations in the entertainment venue where images are displayed                   
        17    to the spectators and that such locations are in relative proximity to the seating                   
        18    locations of the spectators.  (Answer 23, l. 17 to 24, l. 3).  But the Examiner has                  
        19    not determined that such proximate locations of display satisfy the claim                            
        20    requirement of displaying images on a screen “accessible at a seating location of                    
        21    the customer” (Answer 24, ll. 10-14).                                                                
        22          The Examiner determined and the Applicants do not dispute that Showghi                         
        23    discloses an entertainment event at which patrons have identified seats, that the                    
        24    patrons have the option of being provided special hand-held electronic devices                       
        25    which can be used, while the patrons are located at their seats, to order food,                      
        26    drinks, and other event souvenirs to be delivered to their seats.  The Examiner                      
        27    determined and the Applicants do not dispute that the hand-held devices include a                    


                                                        18                                                         

Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013