Ex Parte Novais et al - Page 19


              Appeal 2007-2215                                                                                     
              Application 09/918,287                                                                               
         1    display on which various menus of items offered for sale by the event venue are                      
         2    presented.  Showghi even discloses displaying hierarchical multi-level menus.                        
         3    (Showghi, col.5, ll. 40-48).                                                                         
         4          The Examiner combined the teachings of Showghi with those of Blank and                         
         5    Gluck to meet all the requirements of claim 16.  According to the Examiner,                          
         6    because Showghi discloses that a listing of event souvenirs may be presented on                      
         7    the special hand-held device for ordering by patrons, and because Gluck discloses                    
         8    that at an entertainment event images of spectators at their seating locations can                   
         9    constitute a desirable event souvenir, it would have been obvious to one with                        
        10    ordinary skill in the art to add interactive souvenir image selection to the functions               
        11    supported by Showghi’s special hand-held units.                                                      
        12          The Applicants argue (Appeal Br. 13, ll. 28-32):                                               
        13          There is no disclosure or suggestion that a customer can use such a                            
        14          device to view images of the participants in the entertainment event or                        
        15          of the customer viewing the event, or to select a desired image or                             
        16          images, or to select a desired image product representative of the                             
        17          desired image or images as set forth in claim 16.                                              
        18                                                                                                         
        19    The argument is unpersuasive.  The Examiner need only articulate a rational basis                    
        20    why one with ordinary skill in the art would have known to add imaging products                      
        21    or services like those offered in Gluck at a work station to the souvenir offerings                  
        22    provided by the special hand-held devices of Showghi.  And he did.  The Examiner                     
        23    relied on the souvenir image selection session of Gluck, for implementation on the                   
        24    hand held devices of Showghi.  The hand-held devices of Showghi are described in                     
        25    Showghi as being useful for ordering food, drinks and souvenirs and Gluck                            
        26    discloses that images of the patrons at the entertainment event are souvenirs that                   
        27    may be displayed to patrons for selection and purchase.                                              



                                                        19                                                         

Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013