Appeal 2007-2220
Application 09/896,231
prima facie case of obviousness, the burden then shifts to Appellants to
present evidence or arguments that persuasively rebut the Examiner's prima
facie case. Appellants, however, did not persuasively rebut the Examiner's
prima facie case of obviousness. The rejections are therefore sustained.
DECISION
We have sustained the Examiner's rejections with respect to all claims
on appeal. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-74 is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
16
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013