Ex Parte Monk - Page 11

             Appeal 2007-2451                                                                                         
             Application 10/694,925                                                                                   

         1              The amount to be billed is automatically calculated by the preferred                          
         2              order entry system and captured in the amount to be billed data capture                       
         3              field 110. The total order amount is automatically calculated and                             
         4              captured in total order amount data capture field 105, while the amount                       
         5              left to allocate is automatically calculated and captured in amount left to                   
         6              allocate data capture field 107. (Cameron, col. 11, l. 55 – col. 12, l. 6.)                   
         7           14. If a single payment method is chosen in Cameron’s invention, one                             
         8              hundred percent (100%) of the order total is automatically allocated to                       
         9              that payment method. If more than one payment method is selected, the                         
        10              customer must choose how to allocate their payment methods. A                                 
        11              recalculate button 101 is provided on billing window 100 which, when                          
        12              selected, calculates the dollar amount to be billed to each payment                           
        13              method based on the dollar amounts and percentages captured for each                          
        14              payment method. If the allocation is incomplete, the total amount of the                      
        15              order will be applied to the first payment method, less any coupon or gift                    
        16              certificate.  (Cameron, col. 12, ll. 7-16.)                                                   
        17           15. The Examiner’s findings that the step of transmitting the cost payment                       
        18              to the financial institution is obvious and old to the card reader art and is                 
        19              accomplished in Cameron is not disputed by the Appellant.                                     
        20           16. The Examiner’s findings that Cameron discloses selecting a non-zero                          
        21              portion of a charge to be allocated between two credit cards, a credit                        
        22              card and a stored value instrument, or between two stored value                               
        23              instruments is not disputed by the Appellant.                                                 
        24        Melchione                                                                                           


                                                          11                                                          


Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013