The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HAIHONG WANG,
MINH-VAN NGO, QI XIANG, PAUL R. BESSER, ERIC N. PATON,
AND MING-REN LIN
____________
Appeal 2007-2510
Application 10/389,4561
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: August 10, 2007
____________
Before TEDDY S. GRON, CAROL A. SPIEGEL, and MARK NAGUMO,
Administrative Patent Judges.
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 A. Introduction
2 Applicants ("Wang") appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
3 rejection of claims 21–39, all of the pending claims, as unpatentable under
1 Application filed 14 March 2003. The real-party-in-interest is listed as
Advanced Micro Devices. (Supplemental Brief on Appeal ("Br.") filed
10 October 2006, at 2.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013