Ex Parte Kim et al - Page 7

               Appeal 2007-2513                                                                           
               Application 09/785,443                                                                     

                     As indicated supra, Bergman (col. 13, ll. 1-6) refers to a color                     
               descriptor that defines a histogram as having a particular color space and bin             
               number.  Although Bergman does not disclose a description means defining                   
               color space and a separate description means defining color quantization                   
               method, claim 28 merely requires a description means for both.  Thus,                      
               Bergman discloses the claimed description means.  As to using a method                     
               which is the same as the described color space and color quantization                      
               method, as indicated supra, Bergman transforms one histogram such that it                  
               has the same color space and color quantization method as the other.                       
               Therefore, we will sustain the anticipation rejection of claim 28.                         
                     Regarding claims 29 and 30, Appellants contend (Br. 14) that                         
               Bergman fails to disclose "a retrieval unit for calculating a similarity                   
               between the color histogram of the query multimedia data extracted before1                 
               and the color histogram of the multimedia data to be retrieved."  As                       
               explained by the Examiner (Answer 14), Bergman transforms one histogram                    
               to the same color space and color quantization method as another histogram                 
               so as to be able to compare the two and retrieve the best responses to a                   
               search query.  Thus, Bergman calculates the similarities, and we will sustain              
               the anticipation rejection of claims 29 and 30.                                            
                     For claim 31, Appellant (Br. 14-15) states what is recited in the claim              
               and discusses portions of the Specification, but does not indicate what                    
               specifically is supposedly lacking from Bergman.  In fact, Bergman is not                  
               even mentioned.  Therefore, we will pro forma sustain the anticipation                     
               rejection of claim 31.                                                                     
                                                                                                         
               1 We note that claim 29 is unclear as to what the extraction occurs before.                
               Similar language appears in claim 32.                                                      

                                                    7                                                     

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013