The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte EMANUEL HERMANUS VAN BROEKHOVEN,
JOHANNES WILHELMUS MARIA SONNEMANS
and STEPHAN ZUIJDENDORP
____________________
Appeal No. 2007-2549
Application No. 10/163,2061
Technology Center 1700
____________________
Decided: August 10, 2007
____________________
Before: TEDDY S. GRON, CAROL A. SPIEGEL and MARK NAGUMO,
Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
I. Introduction
Emanuel Hermanus Van Broekhoven, Johannes Wilhelmus Maria
Sonnemans and Stephan Zuijendorp (hereinafter "Appellants") seek our
review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-
1 The Application was filed 5 June 2002. Appellants claim benefit under 35
U.S.C. § 119 of European patent application EP 01202204.2 filed 8 June
2001. The real party-in-interest is said to be Albemarle Netherlands B.V.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013