Ex Parte Broekhoven et al - Page 7

                   Appeal 2007-2549                                                                                                 
                   Application 10/163,206                                                                                           
                    [27] According to Yigong, the regeneration solvent can be selected from a                                       
                           wide range of solvents, preferably at least one non-polar solvent, e.g.,                                 
                           C4 ~ C20 saturated fatty hydrocarbons and aromatics, most preferably                                     
                           C5 ~ C12 saturated fatty hydrocarbons, and/or at least one polar                                         
                           solvent, e.g., alcohols, phenols, ethers, etc.  (Yigong 4:15-20).                                        
                    [28] For example, the regeneration step may comprise discharging the                                            
                           alkylation feedstock from the reactor, flowing a N2 stream across the                                    
                           catalyst bed, pumping a regeneration solvent of 50 wt % C8 and 50 wt                                     
                           % C11 ~ C15 saturated alkanes into the reactor, and flowing a N2 stream                                  
                           across the catalyst (Yigong 6:18-25).                                                                    
                    [29] The Examiner found that the alkylation process described by Yigong                                         
                           used a C8 alkane for regenerating catalyst in an alkylation process                                      
                           similar to the alkylation process of Broekhoven (Answer 3, ¶ 1).                                         
                           Other findings of fact follow below.                                                                     
                   III. Claim Construction                                                                                          
                           “During patent examination the pending claims must be interpreted as                                     
                   broadly as their terms reasonably allow.”  In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321, 13                                    
                   USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 1989).  “The reason is simply that during                                           
                   patent prosecution when claims can be amended, ambiguities should be                                             
                   recognized, scope and breadth of language explored, and clarification                                            
                   imposed.” Id.  “An essential purpose during patent examination is to fashion                                     
                   claims that are precise, clear, correct, and unambiguous.” Id. 893 F.2d at                                       
                   322, 13 USPQ2d at 1322. “Only in this way can uncertainties of claim scope                                       
                   be removed, as much as possible, during the administrative process.” Id.                                         
                           Here, claim 1 requires regeneration of a catalyst in the presence of a                                   
                   hydrocarbon "wherein the hydrocarbon comprises at least a portion of the                                         

                                                                 7                                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013