Ex Parte Broekhoven et al - Page 12

                   Appeal 2007-2549                                                                                                 
                   Application 10/163,206                                                                                           
                   V. Conclusion                                                                                                    
                           In summary, the decision of the Examiner (i) to reject claims 1-14 and                                   
                   20-25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Broekhoven in view of                                             
                   Yigong is affirmed; and, (ii) to reject claims 15-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                                    
                   as obvious over Broekhoven in view of Yigong, as applied to claims 1 and 2,                                      
                   and further in view of Holmes is affirmed.                                                                       
                           No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                                       
                   this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                                                             
                                                          AFFIRMED                                                                  
























                                                                12                                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013