Appeal 2007-2608 Application 10/473,998 We find that Erickson describes the invention of claim 1. As discussed above, claims 2-7 stand or fall with claim 1. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006). AFFIRMED Ssc DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1177 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS (6TH AVENUE) NEW YORK, NY 10036-2714 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: September 9, 2013