Ex Parte Keller - Page 11

                Appeal 2007-2608                                                                              
                Application 10/473,998                                                                        

                      We find that Erickson describes the invention of claim 1.  As                           
                discussed above, claims 2-7 stand or fall with claim 1.  Accordingly, the                     
                rejection of claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is affirmed.                                 
                      No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                      
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).                         

                                                AFFIRMED                                                      















                Ssc                                                                                           



                DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP                                                                         
                1177 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS (6TH AVENUE)                                                      
                NEW YORK, NY 10036-2714                                                                       



                                                     11                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11

Last modified: September 9, 2013