The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PATRICK O. BROWN, YOAV SOEN,
and ERICA KEEN
__________
Appeal 2007-2955
Application 10/190,425
Technology Center 1600
__________
DECIDED: September 24, 2007
__________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC GRIMES, and NANCY J. LINCK,
Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1-4, 6, 10, 31, and 331 as obvious over the prior art.2 We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
1 Claims 7, 9, 11, 17-20, 30, and 32 are also pending but have been
withdrawn from consideration.
2 A rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph has been
withdrawn (Answer 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013