Appeal 2007-3202
Application 10/145,987
According to the Applicants, the rejection of claims 1-5, 7-16,
and 31-40 all stand or fall together. (FF 3).
For the foregoing reasons, the Applicants have shown no error
in the rejection of claims 1-5, 7-13, 15, and 31-40 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as unpatentable over Hines and Mizoshita, and also no error in
the rejection of claims 14 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Hines, Mizoshita, and Gibbons.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1-5, 7-13, 15, and 31-40 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as unpatentable over Hines and Mizoshita is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 14 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Hines, Mizoshita, and Gibbons is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
lp
Paul T. Dietz
Seagate Technology LLC
Intellectual Property Department - NRW097
7801 Computer Avenue South
Bloomington, MN 55435
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: September 9, 2013