The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte MANSOOR MOHAMMED
____________________
Appeal 2007-3395
Application 10/260,7331
Technology Center 1600
____________________
Decided: 28 September 2007
____________________
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, TEDDY S. GRON and
CAROL A. SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
I. Introduction
Mansoor Mohammed (hereinafter "Appellant") seeks our review
under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) of the Examiner's final rejection of all pending
claims in this Application, claims 1-3, 5-7, 13-14, 18-25, 28-31, 34-41, 46-
1 Application filed 27 September 2002. Applicant claims benefit under 35
U.S.C. § 119 of application 60/325,853, filed 27 September 2001. The real
party-in-interest is said to be PerkinElmer LAS, Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013